|
|
Safeguard MeasuresA.
EMERGENCY MEASURES AGAINST INJURIOUS IMPORTS What
are safeguard measures?
The WTO permits Member Countries to provide affected
domestic industries relief against imports under circumstances
specified in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT
1994). Under
Article XIX (Emergency Action on Imports of Particular Products)
of GATT 1994, as clarified and reinforced by the WTO Agreement on
Safeguards, the importing government may take temporary (general)
safeguard measures (higher tariffs, tariff quotas, or quantitative
restrictions) against imports if the
products at issue are being imported in such increased
quantities, either absolute or relative to domestic production,
and under such conditions as to cause or threaten to cause serious
injury to the domestic industry. On
the other hand, the WTO Agreement on Agriculture allows for the
application of special transitional safeguards (additional duty
not exceeding one-third of the level of the effective tariff)
against importations of agricultural products whose quantitative
import restrictions (QR’s) were converted (“tariffied”) into
ordinary customs duties and agricultural products designated with
the symbol “SSG” (Special Safeguard Measures) in the GATT
Schedule of Concessions.
Special
safeguard measures may be invoked, if: i the
volume of imports exceeds a trigger level; or (but not
concurrently) i the
price of imports falls below a trigger price. In
either case, injury to the domestic industry need not
be established. The
purpose for the application of
safeguard measures is to give the affected domestic industry time
to prepare itself for and adjust to increased import competition
resulting from the reduction of tariffs or the lifting of
quantitative restrictions agreed upon in multilateral trade
negotiations. B.
SAFEGUARD ACTIONS VIS-À-VIS
DUMPING/COUNTERVAILING MEASURES How
do safeguard actions differ from anti-dumping and countervailing
measures? Comparison
of Anti-Dumping, Countervailing, and Safeguard Measures
4. Minimum Threshold of Support of Industry for Application
5.
Objective
8.
Imposition of Provisional Measure
C.
THE PHILIPPINE LEGISLATION ON SAFEGUARD MEASURES
1. What is the law on the application of safeguard measures? Republic
Act No. 8800, otherwise known as the “Safeguard Measures Act”
provides for: -
general safeguard measures to relieve domestic
industries suffering from serious injury as a result of increased
imports. -
special safeguard measures (additional duty not
exceeding 1/3 of the existing rate of duty) on agricultural
products marked “SSG’ in Schedule LXXV-Philippines, when the
import volume exceeds its trigger level or when the actual c.i.f.
import price falls below a trigger price level 2. When was R.A. No. 8800 signed?
effective? Former President
Estrada signed the law on July 19, 2000.
R.A. 8800 was published on
July 24, 2000 and took effect on
August 9, 2000, i.e., fifteen (15) days following its
complete publication. 3. Have the rules and regulations to implement R.A. 8800 been
promulgated? Yes,
the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) was signed by the
concerned Secretaries/Agency Heads and published in
Manila Standard on October 4, 2000.
The IRR (Joint Administrative Order No. 03, s. 2000) took
effect on October 11,
2000, i.e., seven (7) days after publication 4. What government agencies administer the Safeguard Measures
Act? General
safeguard measures
D.
PROCEDURES
1. Who may file a petition for safeguard measures? General
safeguard measures i.
Domestic producers as a whole, of like or directly
competitive products manufactured or produced in the Philippines,
or those whole
collective output of like or directly competitive products
constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of
those products; ii.
The President, or the
House or Senate Committee on Agriculture, or the House or Senate
Committee on Trade and Commerce; and iii.
The DTI or DA
Secretary, motu proprio, if there is evidence of increased
imports of the product under consideration.
Special safeguard
measures i.
Any person, whether natural or juridical may
request a verification if a particular agricultural
product can be imposed a special safeguard duty. ii.
The DA Secretary may, motu
proprio, initiate the imposition of a special safeguard
measure following the satisfaction of the conditions for imposing
the measure. 2. Where to file? General
safeguard measures Petitions
for safeguard action shall be filed with the DTI Secretary in the
case of non-agricultural products, or with the DA Secretary in the
case of agricultural products, who shall determine whether or not
the petition is proper in form and substance and whether or not
the documentary requirements are complied with.
Special safeguard
measures The
request shall be filed with the Secretary of the Department of
Agriculture. 3. What are the stages in a safeguard investigation? General
safeguard measures The
general safeguard investigation has four (4) distinct stages: i
Prima Facie Determination
The
DTI-BIS or DA, upon acceptance of the properly documented
petition, has five (5) calendar days to decide whether a prima
facie case exists to merit the initiation of a preliminary
investigation. In its
determination, the BIS or DA undertakes an in-depth evaluation of
the data submitted or provided, together with the information
obtained independently. If
no prima facie case exists, the application is denied. i
Preliminary
Determination
Once
a prima facie case has been established, DTI-BIS initiates the
preliminary determination.
Within
two (2) calendar days after the decision to initiate the
preliminary investigation is made, DTI-BIS or DA notifies all
known interested parties and the government of the exporting
country about the initiation of the investigation and sends a
proforma respondent’s questionnaire to all the interested
parties (importers, domestic manufacturers, exporters, etc.). Not
later than thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of the properly
documented petition, the Secretary shall, on the basis of the
petition, the answers of the respondents and the supporting
documents or information, make a preliminary determination that
increased imports of the product under consideration are a
substantial cause of, or threaten to substantially cause,
serious injury to the domestic industry. In
case of preliminary affirmative findings, the Secretary of either
DTI or DA advises, within three (3) calendar days from making a
decision, the Secretary of Finance to instruct the Bureau of
Customs to impose the provisional safeguard measure.
Such measure shall take the form of a tariff increase
either ad valorem or specific, or both, to be paid through a cash
bond. In the case of
agricultural products, where the tariff increase may not be
sufficient to redress or to prevent serious injury to the domestic
producers, a quantitative restriction may be applied. The
preliminary affirmative findings by the DTI-BIS or DA, together
with the records of the case, shall be transmitted to the
Commission for its immediate formal investigation of the case
within three (3) calendar days from adopting the decision.
However, if the preliminary findings are negative, the DTI
or DA Secretary shall terminate the investigation. i
Formal
Investigation The
Commission shall conduct the formal investigation to determine: a.
if the domestic product is a like product or a product
directly competitive to the imported product under consideration; b.
if the product is being imported into the Philippines in
increased quantities (absolute or relative to domestic
production); c.
the presence and extent of serious injury or
threat thereof to the domestic industry that produces like
or directly competitive product; and d.
the existence of a causal relationship between the
increased imports of the product under consideration and the
serious injury or threat thereof to the affected domestic
industry. The
Commission shall conclude its formal investigation and submit a
report of its findings and conclusions to the Secretary within
one-hundred-twenty (120) calendar days from receipt of the request
from the Secretary, except when the Secretary certifies that the
same is urgent, in which case the Commission shall complete the
investigation and submit the report
within sixty (60) calendar days. Upon
its positive determination, the Commission shall recommend to the
Secretary an appropriate definitive measure. i Decision Within
fifteen (15) calendar days from receipt of the Report of the
Commission, the Secretary shall make a decision, taking into
consideration the measures recommended by the Commission. If
the determination is affirmative, the Secretary shall issue,
within two (2) calendar days after making his decision, a written
instruction to the heads of the concerned government agencies to
implement the appropriate general safeguard measure as determined
by him. In
case of a negative final determination or if the cash bond is in
excess of the definitive safeguard duty assessed, the Secretary
shall immediately issue, through the Secretary of Finance, a
written instruction to the Commissioner of Customs, authorizing
the return of the cash bond or the remainder thereof, as the case
may be, previously collected as provisional general safeguard
measure within ten (10) days from the date the final decision had
been made.
Special safeguard
measures i
Verification
The
DA Secretary shall verify if
the cumulative import volume of an “SSG”-denominated
agricultural product in a given year has exceeded its trigger
volume or, but not concurrently, its actual c.i.f. import price is
less than its trigger price. i
Findings The
Secretary shall come up with a finding within five (5) working
days from the receipt of a request. i
Imposition
of special safeguard measure The
Secretary shall issue a Department Order requesting the
Commissioner of Customs through the Secretary of Finance to impose
an additional special safeguard duty. E.
DETERMINATION OF SERIOUS INJURY OR THREAT THEREOF
General
safeguard measures 1.
What economic factors should the Commission take into
account in determining serious injury? The
Commission shall consider all relevant economic factors,
including: i the
rate and amount of the increase in imports of the product under
consideration in absolute or relative terms; i the
share of the domestic market taken by the increased imports; i changes
in the level of sales, prices, production, productivity, capacity
utilization, inventories, profits and losses, wages and employment
of the domestic industry; i significant
idling of productive facilities in the domestic industry including
the closure of plants or underutilization of production capacity; i inability
of a significant number of firms to carry out domestic production
at a profit; and i significant
unemployment or underemployment within the domestic industry.
Special safeguard
measures Injury
is not an element in the imposition of special safeguard measure. 2. In making a determination of the existence of a threat of
serious injury, what should be considered? i Significant
rate of increase in imports into the Philippines indicating the
likelihood of substantially increased importation, evidenced inter
alia by the existence
of letters of credit, supply or sales contract, the award of a
tender, an irrevocable offer or other similar contracts; i Sufficient
freely disposable, or an imminent, substantial increase in,
production capacity of the foreign exporters including access
conditions they face in third country markets, indicating the
likelihood of substantially increased exports to the Philippines; i Decline
in sales or market share, and a downward trend in production,
profits, wages, productivity or employment (or increasing
underemployment) in the domestic industry and its inability to
generate capital for modernization or to maintain existing levels
of expenditures for research and development; and i Growing
inventories of the product being investigated whether maintained
by Philippine producers, importers, wholesalers or retailers. F.
MEASURES
General
safeguard measures What
are the remedies/measures imposed against the injurious import
surge? i Provisional
measure (applied only after a preliminary affirmative
determination by BIS or DA) Such
measure shall take the form of a tariff increase either ad valorem
or specific, or both, to be paid through a cash bond set at a
level sufficient to redress or prevent serious injury to the
domestic industry. In
the case of non-agricultural products, the Secretary shall first
establish that the imposition of the provisional safeguard measure
would be in the public interest. In
the case of agricultural products, where the tariff increase may
not be sufficient to redress or to prevent serious injury to the
domestic producer or producers, a quantitative restriction may be
applied. The
duration of the provisional measure shall not exceed two hundred
(200) calendar days from the date of imposition. i
Definitive
safeguard measure (following affirmative final determination by
the Commission) a.
An increase in, or imposition of, any duty on the imported
product (not subject or limited to the maximum levels of tariff as
set forth in Section 401 (a) of the Tariff and Customs Code of the
Philippines, as amended); b.
A decrease in or the imposition of a tariff-rate quota (MAV)
on the product; c.
A modification or imposition of any quantitative
restriction on the importation of the product into the
Philippines; d.
One or more appropriate adjustment measures, including the
provision of trade adjustment assistance; e.
Any combination of actions described in subparagraphs (a)
to (d). The
Commission may also recommend other actions, including the
initiation of international negotiations, to address the
underlying cause of the increase in imports of the product to
alleviate the injury or threat thereof to the domestic industry
and to facilitate positive adjustment to import competition.
Special safeguard
measures 1. What special
safeguard measures are imposed with respect to “SSG”-denominated
agricultural products? i
Under the
volume test, the special safeguard duty shall
be set to a level not exceeding one-third (1/3) of the applicable
out-quota customs duty on the agricultural product under
consideration. i On the basis of the price test, the additional duty
shall be computed as follows: i.
Zero, if the price difference is, at most, ten percent
(10%) of the trigger price; or ii.
Thirty percent (30%) of the amount by which the price
difference exceeds ten percent (10%) of the trigger price, if the
said difference exceeds ten percent (10%) but is at most forty
percent (40%) of the trigger price; or iii.
Fifty percent (50%) of the amount by which the price
difference exceeds forty percent (40%) of the trigger price, plus
the additional duty imposed under paragraph ii, if the said
difference exceeds forty percent (40%) but is, at most, sixty
percent (60%) of the trigger price; or iv.
Seventy percent (70%) of the amount by which the price
difference exceeds sixty percent (60%) of the trigger price, plus
the additional duties imposed under paragraphs ii and
iii, if the
said difference exceeds sixty percent (60%) and is, at most,
seventy-five (75%) of the trigger price; or v.
Ninety percent (90%) of the amount by which the price
difference exceeds seventy-five percent (75%) of the trigger
price; plus the additional duties imposed under paragraphs ii,
iii, and iv, if the said difference exceeds seventy-five percent
(75%) of the trigger price. 2. What is the duration of the safeguard measures? Definitive
general safeguard measures General
rule: i The
maximum initial period for the application of the safeguard
measure is four (4) years. Note:
Such four (4) year period shall include the period, if any, in
which a provisional relief was in effect Exception
to the general rule i
The
initial period may be extended up to a maximum of eight (8) years
(10 years for developing countries). Special
safeguard measures The
additional special safeguard duty shall be maintained only until
the end of the year in which it is imposed. 3. What are the limitations in the application of
safeguard measures? i Extent
of redressing or preventing the injury; i To
facilitate the domestic industry’s adjustments from the adverse
effects directly attributed to the increased imports; When
quantitative import
restrictions are used, such measures shall not reduce the
quantity of imports below the average imports for the three (3)
preceding representative years, unless clear justification is
given that a different level is necessary to prevent or remedy a
serious injury. General
safeguard measure shall not
be applied to a product originating from a developing country, if that
country’s share of total imports of the product is less
than three percent (3%), provided that the developing countries
with less than three percent (3%) share collectively account for
not more than nine percent (9%) of the total imports. Special
safeguard measures To
safeguard and enhance the interest of farmers and fisherfolk, the
provisions of Republic Act
No. 8435, otherwise known as the Agriculture and Fisheries
Modernization Act (AFMA), will not be affected by the
provisions of the special safeguard measures under R.A. 8800. There
shall be no recourse to the use of special safeguards measures
concurrently with the general safeguard measure. The
special safeguard provisions of R.A 8800 shall lapse with the
duration of the reform process in agriculture as determined in the
WTO. Thereafter, recourse to safeguard measures
shall be subject to the provisions on general safeguard measures
as provided in R.A. 8800. 4. Can the Commission recommend the application of general
safeguards on a bilateral or selective basis? No.
One of the major guiding principles of the WTO Agreement on
Safeguards is that such measures be applied on a non-selective or
“most-favoured-nation” (MFN) basis.
Article 2(2) states, “Safeguard measures shall be applied
to a product being imported irrespective of its source.” Thus, a
WTO Member may not choose specific countries against whose exports
it applies the measures. 5. Does the Philippines have to pay compensation to apply a
general safeguard measure? Yes.
The Philippines, when applying safeguard measures, must
generally “pay” for them through compensation which is
substantially the equivalent level of concessions and other
obligations with respect to affected exporting WTO members.
To do so, any adequate means of trade compensation may be
agreed upon by the affected Members through consultation.
In the absence of such agreement on compensation within
thirty (30) days, the affected exporting Members may individually
suspend substantially equivalent concessions and other obligations
(i.e. retaliate) unless the Council for Trade in Goods
disapproves. However,
this right to retaliate may not be exercised for the first three
years that a safeguard measure is in effect, provided that the
measure has been taken as a result of an absolute increase in
imports, and conforms to the provisions of the Agreement. G.
ADJUSTMENT PLAN IN GENERAL SAFEGUARD ACTION
1. What is the adjustment plan to be submitted by the
concerned domestic industry or other concerned parties to
facilitate positive adjustment to import competition? The
“adjustment plan” is the action plan indicating
a set of quantified goals, specific programs, and
timetables that a concerned industry commits to undertake in order
to facilitate the industry’s positive adjustment
to import competition (e.g., adoption of improve
technology, rationalization
of production structures). 2. When is the adjustment plan
submitted to the Commission? i Within
forty-five (45) calendar days upon receipt of the notice. i Within
thirty (30) calendar days upon receipt of the notice, if the
investigation is certified as ”urgent.” 3. What is the task of the Commission with regard to the
adjustment plan? The
Commission shall monitor developments with respect to the domestic
industry, including its progress and the specific efforts made by
workers and firms in the domestic industry to effect a
positive adjustment to import competition. The
Commission shall submit to the Secretary a report on the results
of the monitoring after hearing all interested parties including
the Department of Labor and Employment. H.
POST FORMAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMISSION
What
tasks remain to be done by the Commission after its formal
investigation of general safeguard cases? i Monitoring
of the domestic industry’s progress and specific efforts to
bring about a positive adjustment to import competition; i Conduct
of investigation on the request for extension and re-application
of safeguard measures; i Conduct
of investigation on request for reduction, modification and
termination of safeguard action; and i After
the termination of the safeguard measure, evaluation of the
effectiveness of the actions taken by the domestic industry in
facilitating positive adjustment to import competition. I.
COMPATIBILITY OF THE SAFEGUARD MEASURES ACT WITH THE WTO
AGREEMENT ON SAFEGUARDS
Is
R.A. 8800 aligned with the WTO Agreement?
On the whole, the national legislation conforms with the
Agreement except on the provision for quantitative restriction as
a provisional measure for agricultural products.
The Agreement allows only for tariff adjustment as a form
of provisional measure. J.
ATTRACTION OF GENERAL SAFEGUARD MEASURES VIS-À-VIS
ANTI-DUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTIES
Will
concerned domestic industries elect to petition for safeguard
measures more than for anti-dumping and countervailing relief? ·
Yes.
The grounds for the imposition of
general safeguard measure are less stringent.
All that has to be established is the existence of the
seriously injurious increase in the volume of imports. In the case
of anti-dumping and countervailing investigations, strict criteria
are prescribed for determining dumping (i.e., export price is less
than normal value in the exporting countries) and subsidization.
Moreover, countervailing cases necessarily involves the
Philippine government and the subsidizing foreign government, a
situation that may cause intra-state frictions.
Since the enactment of the Safeguard Measures Act in 2000, six (6) safeguards cases (cement, float glass, figured glass, glass mirror, ceramic tiles, sodium tripolyphosphates technical grade) were investigated by the DTI-BIS and TC. · No.
The “serious” injury element in safeguard cases
requires a more stringent test than the “material” injury as
required in anti-dumping or countervailing investigation.
In
the case of special safeguard measures, injury need not be
established. Only the volume or price of imports will be
verified to be exceeding a base trigger level or falling below a
trigger price, respectively.
|
|
|